It’s a 5.6 from the Russian judge
First - you lose something. If three people say I am poor and three people say I am fantastic then being told that overall I am average simply isn't correct and, worse, is misleading.
Second - the average isn't correct. It assumes that people evenly score on the range. But, particularly us Brits, people don't like scoring at the extremes....so, when they do, it needs to carry more weight.
Third - 360 degree feedback is meant to give you a rounded opinion, a range of feedback. Leave the detail in, is what I say.
And finally, the conversations from the 360 are often painful. They start with "I'm 3.7 on Leadership and 3.6 on Customer Service, so I need to work on Customer Service". The precision of numbers is misleading.
Together with colleagues, I set up a company concentrating on 360 degree appraisal to give companies a chance to handle 360s effectively and efficiently. Our recommendation is always that the feedback report should give a simple representation of what has been said and keep numbers away. If there is a craven need for a score - then use something like a spidergraph to show an overall picture but don't create scores for each behaviour.
Brendan
Find out more about online 360 degree appraisal systems with Bowland Solutions